Question by Gorginhanson: Can you think of a Purely Unselfish Act?
This Question is Rolling! This is the third time I’ve asked it and her is the compilation of my rebuttals- only 1 good answer so far in my opinion
Here are the first 2 sets if you would like to take a gander
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnSp03iuZQt3VjFCKtO4xvLsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090409174155AAFPB5X
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ailk3e5RufyBk1h1w4J3zNbsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090409180718AAGpeA4
The question is CAN YOU think of one, if you CANT don’t say anything unless you have a good explanation
the only problem is that I won’t be able to correct you
The most common one is going to be that someone says that someone dies for their child, but the reason that that doesn’t work is that the parent just doesn’t want to live with the pain- The option of not saving the child is so undesirable that they won’t even consider it, no way would they want that to happen
It is not PURELY unselfish because the parent feels that they would rather die than let their child die, they picked this choice because the alternative was unbearable, love makes you feel good and that’s just a fact, taking away the person you love is unbearable, it HURTS
too complicated to be unselfish (PURELY)
I’m not saying the act is selfish people, dont tear out my throat…its just not PURELY unselfish, no one wants to let go of this one though… TOO BAD
Volunteering or whatever either makes them FEEL GOOD about doing some good
or 2) the feel like they have fulfilled some societal debt (they are resolving themselves of some kind of guilt)
3)They like telling other people that they’re so awesome that they volunteer.
Next up I’ve gotten this one a few times
“opening a door for someone”, this will bring us back to societal debt I discussed above, it’s the right thing to do so you do it, not necessarily because you want to, but because of something that has been pre-programmed into you that you do at childhood, (being courteous)
sub-consciously you’re bending to a societal pressure here, you aren’t Jesus for holding a door open for someone…
Next up
“Thinking of universal welfare, peace, prosperity and happiness is the only pure unselfish act”
No good buddy, that makes you feel too good inside, everyone likes to think about good things
One guy said that “selfishness” is the only selfless act, well if he had half a brain he would realize before he said one more word that being selfish isn’t being unselfish… sometimes the simplest answer is best no matter how many other things I can say about that…
One guy said the big bang was unselfish… I’m talking about human acts OBVIOUSLY, please think before you speak
Giving away money goes back to that volunteering I talked about, it makes you feel good or its a tax break, or you can brag- NO dice
A couple people tried to tweak the definition to come out on top… just don’t do that, it goes against the real question
Next up, one girl said “Picking up a pop can on the ground and throwing in the trash.” can be unselfish,
For this one we go back to societal debt, bragging, etc
Think about this one lady, how much guilt trip bullshit do recycling campaigns throw at you? they want to build up your feelings of societal debt
Last one I’m going to disprove and then comes the “good” one, not really good, but it’s the best I’ve seen so far
One lady said giving your child up for adoption to people who can’t have one, no good lady, you’re doing something for the unfortunate and that’s going to make you feel good in at least one sense- (same principal as giving money, I dont care what you give away), if you do it to get rid of your kid… you just didn’t want the kid, now did you?
Ok best answer so far by Deereman
“How about if one gave their life for a complete and total stranger? I believe this would qualify since the person has no connection to the other person like they would have for a child, family member or friend.”
I’ve thought of this, and I have a few “rules” that this would have to follow… first of all you would have to not think about that guy’s life, (if you didnt save him you would feel so guilty about his death), second you would have to have no one close to you or you would upset them, thirdly, you would have to value your own life ( someone suicidal doesn’t count) and lastly you can’t feel heroic or anything for or while doing it- basically you would have to not think about it at all, but the problem with this is that it would be instinctual which is a combination of societal debt (feeling the need to help others in any way) and acting on instinct doesn’t seem to qualify as unselfish
ok then now, THOUGHTS people? have I roused your interest or did you not even make it halfway through this
Best answer:
Answer by highball116
Lots of people say there’s no such thing as altruism because self-interest is present in every instance. My question is, just because the actor benefits in some way from the action, does that mean that it cannot be altruistic? Why is everyone so hung up on purity?
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!